Documents are arranged by case number and by date of filing.
[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]
|
Description of Document
|
Presentor
|
Date Filed
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification] | ||
|
[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings], January 4, 1966
|
Conrad G. Tuohey
|
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO NO. 7814 |
PHIL SILVER, et al., Petitioners,
v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents. |
|
| SACRAMENTO NO. 7815 |
ABE VICKTER, et al., Petitioners,
v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents. THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors. |
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan," November 8, 1967
Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet] AB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) |
Charles J. Conrad, Assemblyman
|
November 8, 1967
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary line between the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November 7, 1967
|
William T. Bagley, Assemblyman
|
November 9, 1967
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistricting plan," November 10, 1967
AB No. 3 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Amendments Req. #27182 Amendments Req. #27266 |
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
|
November 10, 1967
|
|
Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps]
|
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
|
|
|
Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November 1967) [statistics]
|
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
|
|
|
Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical summary]
|
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
|
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State's Congressional Districts," November 10, 1967
Affidavit of Service by Mail Amendments to SB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176 Statistical Summary Los Angeles County [map] |
John F. McCarthy, State Senator
|
November 10, 1967
|
|
Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Including the County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967
|
County Supervisors
|
November 10, 1967
|
|
Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts and Brief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.
|
Joseph A. Ball
|
November 10, 1967
|
|
Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the Vickter Plan, n.d.
|
[None]
|
November 10, 1967
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO NO. 7917 |
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,
v. ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents. |
|
|
Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list]
|
[None]
|
|
|
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8, 1971
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d. |
Herman F. Selvin
|
December 15, 1971
|
|
Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing of Opposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jr., December 15, 1971
|
Herman F. Selvin
|
December 15, 1971
|
|
Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Restraining Order, December 15, 1971
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
December 15, 1971
|
|
Alternative Writ of Mandate, n.d.
|
Chief Justice Wright
|
December 17, 1971
|
|
News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Directing Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting, December 17, 1971
|
Administrative Office of the Courts
|
|
|
Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d.
|
G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of the Supreme Court]
|
December 20, 1971
|
|
Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971
|
Herman F. Selvin
|
December 20, 1971
|
|
Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, December 21, 1971
|
Daniel Hays Lowenstein
|
December 21, 1971
|
|
Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
December 21, 1971
|
|
Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of the California State Senate, n.d.
|
Robert S. Daggett
|
December 23, 1971
|
|
Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of the California State Senate to Intervene as Parties or to Participate as Amici Curiae, December 22, 1971
|
Robert S. Daggett
|
December 23, 1971
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice Wright re SAC No. 7917, December 27, 1971
|
Herman F. Selvin
|
December 27, 1971
|
|
Application for Order to File Complaint in Intervention by Way of Return and Answer to Alternative Writ of Mandate, with Complaint; Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, and Order Thereon, December 27, 1971
|
Richards, Watson and Dreyfuss
|
December 28, 1971
|
|
Petitioners' Reply to Amicus Curiae Memorandum and Briefs, n.d.
|
Herman F. Selvin
|
January 3, 1971
|
|
Letter from City of Simi Valley re California Reapportionment Plan for Assembly and Senatorial Districts, January 14, 1972
|
Verne H. Tindell, City Attorney
|
|
|
Statement of Robert G. Beverly, January 17, 1972
|
Robert G. Beverly
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Substitution of Attorney for Respondent Reinecke, June 6, 1973
|
Supreme Court
|
June 11, 1973
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO 7919 |
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Secretary of State of the State of California, Petitioner,
v. RONALD REAGAN, Governor of the State of California |
|
|
#7919: Brown v. Reagan, December 27, 1971 January 19, 1972 [handwritten list]
|
[None]
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Amicus Briefs in #7919 [handwritten list]
|
[None]
|
|
|
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, December 27, 1971
|
Daniel Hays Lowenstein and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
|
December 27, 1971
|
|
Exhibits to Petition for Writ of Mandamus, n.d.
|
December 27, 1971
|
|
|
Brief of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of the California State Senate, Urging That the Petition Be Dismissed for Lack of Indispensable parties or Jurisdiction, n.d.
|
Robert S. Daggett
|
December 30, 1971
|
|
Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Members of the California State Senate, to Participate as Amici Curiae on the Side of Respondent, December 29, 1971
|
Robert S. Daggett
|
December 30, 1971
|
|
Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of an Alternative Writ of Mandamus, December 30, 1971
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
December 31, 1971
|
|
Application of Robert Monagan and John Stull for Permission to File Brief as Amici Curiae and Order Thereon, and Brief, December 31, 1971
Exhibits A, B and C, n.d. |
Halley and Cornell
|
January 3, 1972
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice Wright re Brown vs. Reagan SAC. 7919 from Secretary of State, January 6, 1972
|
Daniel H. Lowenstein
|
January 6, 1972
|
|
Application of Ed Reinecke to Intervene or Participate as Amicus Curiae, Order Thereon, Response of Ed Reinecke, January 5, 1972
|
John V. Diepenbrock
|
January 6, 1972
|
|
Appendix I to Response of Ed Reinecke, the CSI [Compass Systems Inc.] Reapportionment Plan [tables and maps], n.d.
Appendix II to Response of Ed Reinecke, Comparison of CSI Plan with Petitioner's Plan [maps], n.d. |
John V. Diepenbrock
|
January 6, 1972
|
|
Petition for Leave to Intervene for Relief Against Both Petitioner and Respondent (in behalf of ... Alfred Alquist et al.]); and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, January 7, 1972
|
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin Special Counsel
|
January 10, 1972
|
|
Application of City of Concord for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, and Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, January 10, 1972
|
David J. Levy, City Attorney
|
January 10, 1972
|
|
Application of City of Pinole for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, and Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, January 10, 1972
|
David J. Levy, City Attorney
|
January 10, 1972
|
|
Application of Nathaniel Bates for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 10, 1972
|
Nathaniel Bates, [Mayor of Richmond], and Samuel V. McGrath, Deputy City Attorney
|
January 11, 1972
|
|
Application for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief on Behalf of: the Valley Round Table, San Fernando Chamber of Commerce, Canoga Park Chamber of Commerce, San Fernando Valley Business and Professional Association, January 11, 1972
|
LaFollette, Johnson, Horgan and Robinson
|
January 12, 1972
|
|
Application of John M. Shelton and Lawrence E. Wayte for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 10, 1972
|
Chinello, Chinello and Maddy
|
January 13, 1972
|
|
[Angelita Garcia ... vs. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. ...] Motion for Leave to Intervene; Petition for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 12, 1972
Exhibits [Index] Exhibits Numbered A----P [Exhibit I missing] Related Documents Exhibit BB and BB-1 [Not listed in Index] |
Cruz Reynoso , et al.
|
January 13, 1972
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice re ... SAC 7919 from City Council of Riverside, January 13, 1972
|
John Woodhead, City Attorney
|
|
|
Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
|
William T. Bagley and Arthur V. Azevedo
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Petition of the City Council of the City of Downey and Its Members as Registered Voters and Taxpayers, for Leave to Intervene as Respondents, Supporting Declaration and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Writ of Mandate, January 13, 1972
|
Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, and Burke, Williams and Sorensen
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandate by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 13, 1972
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application of Michael Halliwell for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
Michael Halliwell
|
|
|
Application of Board of Supervisors of Riverside County for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., County Counsel
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application of the City of Redwood City, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, the Council of the City of Redwood City, and James M. Fales, Jr., Manager of the City of Redwood City, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
David E. Schriker, City Attorney
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re SAC 7919 [Volume I of Brown Brief], January 14, 1972
|
Daniel H. Lowenstein
|
|
|
Brief of Petitioner Edmund G. Brown, Jr., [Volume I] [maps, tables] January 14, 1972
See January 17 for Volume II. |
Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application of Board of Supervisors, County of San Mateo, California, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
|
Keith C. Sorensen District Attorney, and James M. Parmales, Chief Civil Deputy
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of the City of South Gate, a Municipal Corporation, for Permission to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
|
John J. Gottes, City Attorney
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Declarations of Michael B. Berman on Corrections of Legislature's Apportionment Plan, and Memorandum in Support, January 13, 1972
|
Michael B. Berman
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the State of California, and City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation, for Permission to File Brief as Amici Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
Richard. W. Dickenson, County Counsel, and Monroe N. Langdon, City Attorney
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of John Philip Coghlan and the Town of Hillsborough, California, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
John Philip Coghlan
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of Roy Mespelt, Richard H. Bartke, Frank Cortese, Jr., and Kenneth A. Berndt, to File Brief as Amici Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
|
Tinning and Delap
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Reply of Intervenors Alquist, Moscone, Corey, McAlister and Waxman to Response of Ed Reinecke, January 15, 1972
|
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application for Permission to File a Brief Amici Curiae, January 17, 1972
|
Putnam Livermore, Chairman and Attorney of the Republican State Central Committee
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of Charles W. Yetter for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae, January 17, 1972
|
James M. Himmel
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Application of State Senators Joseph Kennick, Albert Rodda and Alan Short for Leave to File a Brief Amicus Curiae (Together with Supporting Declaration) in Support of the Petitioner, January 17, 1972
|
Seth M. Hufstedler
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Brief, Amicus Curiae, of John L. Burton, Member of the Assembly of the Legislature of the State of California, in Support of Petitioner, January 17, 1972
|
John L. Burton
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Brief Amicus Curiae of Senators Kennick, Rodda and Short, Together with Declaration of Alan G. Rosin in Support of the Petitioner, January 17, 1972
|
Seth M. Hutstedler
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Brief of Petitioner Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Volume II, January 17, 1972
See January 14, 1972 for Volume I |
Daniel Hays Lowenstein
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Declaration of Michael B. Berman on the Consequences of the Third Count for the Equal Population Requirement of Congressional and Assembly Reapportionment, January 19, 1972
|
Michael B. Berman
|
|
|
Motion for Leave to Intervene; by T. Jim Gibson, The Wall Street Political Association, January 17, 1972
|
Loren Miller, Jr., and Dion G. Morrow
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Supplemental Brief of Assemblymen Monagan and Stull, Declarations in Support Thereof, and Exhibits, January 17, 1972
Exhibit B Exhibit F, Part 2 Exhibit G, Part 2 |
Halley and Cornell
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice from City Council of Downey [requesting] "leave of Court to Withdraw Their Petition for Leave to Intervene," January 21, 1972
|
Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, and Burke, Williams and Sorensen
|
January 24, 1972
|
|
[Denial of] the Motion of Angelita Garcia et al. for Leave to Intervene, n.d.
|
Chief Justice Wright
|
February 9, 1972
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO 7923 |
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Petitioners,
v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents |
|
|
Members of Congress v. Reagan [handwritten list]
|
[None]
|
|
|
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 5, 1972
|
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
|
January 6, 1972
|
|
Exhibit "A" to Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (California Legislature -- 1971 1st Extraordinary Session, Assembly Bill No. 16), n.d.
|
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
|
January 6, 1972
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice re SAC. 7923 [re Consolidation], January 11, 1972
|
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
|
January 11, 1972
|
|
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandate by Way of Answer [re Wilson Riles as Respondent], January 14, 1972
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 14, 1972
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application to Participate as Amicus Curiae, January 14 , 1972 [Robert L. Galloway, Phillip McNuff and Ronald Clause]
|
Frank J. Pagliaro, Jr.
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus, January 17, 1972
|
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application to Participate as Amicus Curiae, February 16, 1972 [in opposition to petitioners]
|
Robert W. Naylor
|
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO 7917 |
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners,
v. ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents. |
|
| SACRAMENTO 7919 |
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Secretary of State of the State of California, Petitioner,
v. RONALD REAGAN, Governor of the State of California, Respondent. |
|
|
Consolidated Action from 1/7/72 [handwritten list]
|
[None]
|
|
|
Letter re [consolidation], January 7, 1972
|
G.E. Bishel, Clerk of the Supreme Court
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "On Behalf of Senator John L. Harmer, Senator Fred W. Marler, Jr., and the Other Republican Members of the California State Senate" [re consolidation], January 12, 1972
|
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
|
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice for City Council of the City of Downey, January 13, 1972
|
Burke, Williams and Sorenson
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court [re Ed Reinecke], January 13, 1972
|
Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant and Hannegan
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 14, 1972
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 14, 1972
|
Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin, Berkowitz and Selvin
|
|
|
Letter to Chief Justice "on behalf of Senators Harmer and Marler and the Other Republican Members of the State Senate," January 14, 1972
Exhibit A: The Agreed Bipartisan Senate Reapportionment Plan, Senate Bill 18 [6 volumes of legislative history and 5 maps], n.d. Exhibit B: Senate Reapportionment Plan Proposed by Its Republican Members, Senate Bill 8 in the 1st 1971 Extraordinary Session [with 6 maps], n.d. |
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
|
January 14, 1972
|
|
Application for Permission to File Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and James S. Allison, Registrar-Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, and Brief, January 12, 1972
|
Edward H. Gaylord
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Brief of Petitioners, the Legislature, et al., and Intervenors Alquist, et al., in Reply to Briefs of Board of Supervisors, et al., and of Michael Halliwell as Amici Curiae, and to Petition of Angelita Garcia, et al., January 17, 1972
|
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Declaration of Ed Reinecke [re Compass Systems, Inc. Plan], January 17, 1972
|
Thomas B. Hofeller
|
|
|
Declaration of W.N. Durley [of CSI, Inc.], January 17, 1972
Related Documents 8 maps [1 copy only] |
W.N. Durley
|
|
|
Declaration of Houston L. Flournoy, January 17, 1972
|
Houston L. Flournoy
|
January 17, 1972
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "On behalf of Assemblyman Robert Monagan and Assemblyman John Stull," January 17, 1972
|
Halley and Cornell
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "on behalf of Assemblyman Robert G. Beverly," January 17, 1972
|
Richards, Watson and Dreyfuss
|
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 17, 1972
|
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Secretary of State
|
|
|
|
||
| SACRAMENTO 7917 |
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,
v. ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State, etc., et al., Respondents. |
|
| SACRAMENTO 7919 |
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Secretary of State, etc., Petitioner,
v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, Respondent. |
|
| SACRAMENTO 7923 |
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Petitioners,
v. RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents. |
|
|
Consolidated Cases [handwritten list]
|
K.K.
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
[Court Order re Reapportionment ]
|
Chief Justice
|
January 18, 1972
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "memorandum of costs on behalf of Senators Harmer and Marler," January 20, 1972
|
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
|
|
|
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Senators John L. Harmer Fred W. Marler, January 20, 1972
|
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Memorandum of Costs on Behalf of Ed Reinecke, January 24, 1972
|
Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant and Hannegan
|
|
|
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Ed Reinecke, January 24, 1972
|
John V. Diepenbrock
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "memorandum of costs on behalf of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull," January 26, 1972
|
Halley and Cornell
|
|
|
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull, Amici Curiae, January 26, 1972
|
Halley and Cornell
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Motion for Leave to Intervene and Supplementary Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, by Angelita Garcia, et al., February 7, 1972
|
California Rural Legal Assistance, et al.
|
|
|
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs or the Part of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull, n.d.
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Ed Reinecke, n.d.
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., n.d.
|
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
|
February 10, 1972
|
|
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of ... the Legislature ... and on the Part of Senators Alquist and Moscone [et al.], February 24, 1972
|
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
|
March 1, 1972
|
|
Request for Modification of Opinion from State Senate, April 28, 1972
|
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel
|
May 1, 1972
|
|
Request by the Assembly of the Legislature of the State of California for Modification of Opinion; and. Supporting Memorandum, October 27, 1972
|
George H. Murphy , Legislative Counsel and Herman E. Selvin, Special Counsel
|
October 30, 1972
|
|
Request and Order for Substitution of Parties, April 11, 1973
|
Robert Monagan, et al.
|
|
|
Letter to James W. Halley [re Substitution of Parties], April 17, 1973
|
G.E. Bishel, Clerk of the Supreme Court
|
|
|
Brief of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Masters on Reapportionment, September 28, 1973
|
Paul N. McCloskey, Jr.
|
September 28, 1973
|
|
Analysis and Critique of Special Masters on Reapportionment Recommendations and Brief in Behalf of an Alternative Plan, n.d.
Exhibit C: [Group of 12 photocopy maps, with one set of autopositive originals] California County Subdivisions Census County Divisions and Places Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Exhibit D: Alternative Plan: Criteria Explanation, District Descriptions Exhibit E: Alternative Districts Overlaid with Masters' Districts [group of 12 maps] California County Subdivisions -- Census County Divisions and Places Assembly Districts, Proposed Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts, Proposed Senate Districts Congressional Districts, Proposed Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area Assembly Districts Senatorial Districts Congressional Districts Exhibit F: [Comparison Between Masters' Final Plan and Halliwell Plan] Assembly Districts Senate Districts Congressional Districts Related Documents Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "supplemental material," Michael J. Halliwell November 1, 1973 Exhibits Presented with Oral Argument [list], n.d. Masters' District Registration (pp. 13-21) [Folder] Maps [numbered 1----12 [with markings] Masters' District Registration Assembly District Registration Senate District Registration Congress District Registration Census Tracts Making up Assembly District 37 as Proposed by the Masters of the California Supreme Court, etc. [Envelope containing 8 statistical lists] See also Register of Official Records No. 11 |
Michael J. Halliwell
|
October 1, 1973
|
|
Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Special Masters' Report and Recommendations on Reapportionment [for Imperial County], n.d.
|
James H. Harmon, County Counsel, et al.
|
October 2, 1973
|
|
Brief Filed by the City Attorney of the City of Glendale, State of California, on Behalf of the City of Glendale as Amicus Curiae in the Above Entitled Action Opposition to a Portion of the Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment September 28, 1973
|
Joseph W. Rainville, City Attorney
|
October 2, 1973
|
|
Brief of Board of Supervrisors of Riverside County as Amicus Curiae on Report of Special Masters on Reapportionment , September 28, 1973
|
Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., ounty Counsel
|
October 2, 1973
|
|
Letter to the Clerk of the Supreme Court re "Brief of the California State Senate," October 2, 1973
|
Brobeck , Phleger and Harrison
|
|
|
Brief of the California State Senate, September 28, 1973
Material Accompanying Brief of California State Senate, n.d, |
Robert S. Daggett
|
October 2, 1973
|
|
Brief for Congressman Victor V. Veysey in Opposition to a Portion of the Masters' Report, October 1, 1973
|
Reid, Babbage and Coil
|
October 2, 1973
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Exception and Petition for Modification, John J. Miller, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Western Region, October 2, 1973
|
John J. Miller, Assemblyman
|
October 4, 1973
|
|
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Objections and Recommended Revisions of the Woodland Hills Residents Association, et al., October 17, 1973
|
Tuttle and Taylor
|
|
|
Objections and Recommended Revisions of Woodland Hills Residents Association, Tarzana Property Owners Association, Calabasas Chamber of Commerce, and Save Old Calabasas Committee to Special Masters Proposed 38th and 43rd Assembly Districts, n.d.
Exhibit C: [map] |
Antonio Rossman
|
|
|
Letter from County of Ventura Suggesting Alterations to Masters' Plan, October 23, 1973
3 Maps [originals and photographs] Assembly District 36: Ventura County Plan Assembly Districts 36, 37, 38: Masters Plan Senate Plan |
Monty C. Lish, County Executive
|
|
|
[Map of Coronado with proposed alterations to Masters' Plan]
|
[City of Coronado]
|
|
|
[Map of Assembly districts, northern Alameda County with proposed alterations to Masters' Plan]
|
Senators Petris and Holmdahl
|
|
|
Los Angeles-Long Beach Area, Masters Reapportionment Proposal for the 29th Senatorial District, and the 47th and 48th Assembly Districts; Proposed Realignment of the 47th and 48th Assembly Districts, [map with markings], n.d.
|
[None]
|
|