[index]  [next]  [prev] Section 2. Documents Relating to Specific Legal Cases

Documents are arranged by case number and by date of filing.

[This document is best viewed using Netscape or Internet Explorer version 4 or higher, or another browser which understands style sheets.]

Description of Document
Presentor
Date Filed

SACRAMENTO NO. 7679/7681 [No further identification]

[Map of San Bernardino and Orange Counties, with markings], January 4, 1966
Conrad G. Tuohey

SACRAMENTO NO. 7814
PHIL SILVER, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents.


SACRAMENTO NO. 7815
ABE VICKTER, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor, etc., et al., Respondents.

THE SENATE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Intervenors.


Letter to Chief Justice re "a [Congressional] reapportionment plan," November 8, 1967

Minimum Change Plan [pamphlet]

AB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)

Charles J. Conrad, Assemblyman
November 8, 1967
Letter to Chief Justice re "proposal for drawing the boundary line between the 1st and 6th Congressional Districts" [map], November 7, 1967
William T. Bagley, Assemblyman
November 9, 1967
Letter to Chief Justice Traynor re "a Congressional redistricting plan," November 10, 1967

AB No. 3 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session)

Amendments Req. #27182

Amendments Req. #27266

Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
November 10, 1967
Proposed Reapportionment of California's Congressional Districts (1967) [maps]
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts (November 1967) [statistics]
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
Proposed Reapportionment Plan of California's Congressional Districts [statistical summary]
Jack R. Fenton, Assemblyman
Letter to Chief Justice re "plan to reapportion the State's Congressional Districts," November 10, 1967

Affidavit of Service by Mail

Amendments to SB No. 2 (1967, 2nd Extraordinary Session) Req. #27176

Statistical Summary

Los Angeles County [map]

John F. McCarthy, State Senator
November 10, 1967
Proposal for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts Including the County of San Bernardino [map], November 10, 1967
County Supervisors
November 10, 1967
Proposed Plan for Reapportionment of Congressional Districts and Brief [with supporting documentation and maps], n.d.
Joseph A. Ball
November 10, 1967
Allocation of Census Units for Districts Proposed by the Vickter Plan, n.d.
[None]
November 10, 1967

SACRAMENTO NO. 7917
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,

v.

ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents.


Legislature v. Reinecke, 1971-1972 [handwritten list]
[None]
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, December 8, 1971

Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d.

Herman F. Selvin
December 15, 1971
Application for Action on Petition Without Requiring Prior Filing of Opposition, December 14, 1971; Supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, n.d.; and Declaration of Edmund G. Brown, Jr., December 15, 1971
Herman F. Selvin
December 15, 1971
Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Restraining Order, December 15, 1971
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
December 15, 1971
Alternative Writ of Mandate, n.d.
Chief Justice Wright
December 17, 1971
News Release #153: State Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Directing Reapportionment Commission Not To Do Any Districting, December 17, 1971
Administrative Office of the Courts
Alternative Writ of Prohibition or Mandate, n.d.
G.E. Bishel, [Clerk of the Supreme Court]
December 20, 1971
Reply to Memorandum of Attorney General, December 16, 1971
Herman F. Selvin
December 20, 1971
Answer of Respondent Edmund G. Brown, Jr. to Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or Mandate and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, December 21, 1971
Daniel Hays Lowenstein
December 21, 1971
Return to Alternative Writ by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Peremptory Writ, n.d.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
December 21, 1971
Memorandum of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and the Other Republican Members of the California State Senate, n.d.
Robert S. Daggett
December 23, 1971
Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of the California State Senate to Intervene as Parties or to Participate as Amici Curiae, December 22, 1971
Robert S. Daggett
December 23, 1971
Letter to Chief Justice Wright re SAC No. 7917, December 27, 1971
Herman F. Selvin
December 27, 1971
Application for Order to File Complaint in Intervention by Way of Return and Answer to Alternative Writ of Mandate, with Complaint; Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, and Order Thereon, December 27, 1971
Richards, Watson and Dreyfuss
December 28, 1971
Petitioners' Reply to Amicus Curiae Memorandum and Briefs, n.d.
Herman F. Selvin
January 3, 1971
Letter from City of Simi Valley re California Reapportionment Plan for Assembly and Senatorial Districts, January 14, 1972
Verne H. Tindell, City Attorney
Statement of Robert G. Beverly, January 17, 1972
Robert G. Beverly
January 17, 1972
Substitution of Attorney for Respondent Reinecke, June 6, 1973
Supreme Court
June 11, 1973

SACRAMENTO 7919
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Secretary of State of the State of California, Petitioner,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, Governor of the State of California


#7919: Brown v. Reagan, December 27, 1971 ­ January 19, 1972 [handwritten list]
[None]
Miscellaneous Amicus Briefs in #7919 [handwritten list]
[None]
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, December 27, 1971
Daniel Hays Lowenstein and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
December 27, 1971
Exhibits to Petition for Writ of Mandamus, n.d.
December 27, 1971
Brief of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Republican Members of the California State Senate, Urging That the Petition Be Dismissed for Lack of Indispensable parties or Jurisdiction, n.d.
Robert S. Daggett
December 30, 1971
Application of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Members of the California State Senate, to Participate as Amici Curiae on the Side of Respondent, December 29, 1971
Robert S. Daggett
December 30, 1971
Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of an Alternative Writ of Mandamus, December 30, 1971
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
December 31, 1971
Application of Robert Monagan and John Stull for Permission to File Brief as Amici Curiae and Order Thereon, and Brief, December 31, 1971

Exhibits A, B and C, n.d.

Halley and Cornell
January 3, 1972
Letter to Chief Justice Wright re Brown vs. Reagan SAC. 7919 from Secretary of State, January 6, 1972
Daniel H. Lowenstein
January 6, 1972
Application of Ed Reinecke to Intervene or Participate as Amicus Curiae, Order Thereon, Response of Ed Reinecke, January 5, 1972
John V. Diepenbrock
January 6, 1972
Appendix I to Response of Ed Reinecke, the CSI [Compass Systems Inc.] Reapportionment Plan [tables and maps], n.d.

Appendix II to Response of Ed Reinecke, Comparison of CSI Plan with Petitioner's Plan [maps], n.d.

John V. Diepenbrock
January 6, 1972
Petition for Leave to Intervene for Relief Against Both Petitioner and Respondent (in behalf of ... Alfred Alquist et al.]); and Memorandum of Points and Authorities, January 7, 1972
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin Special Counsel
January 10, 1972
Application of City of Concord for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, and Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, January 10, 1972
David J. Levy, City Attorney
January 10, 1972
Application of City of Pinole for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, and Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Issuance of Writ of Mandate, January 10, 1972
David J. Levy, City Attorney
January 10, 1972
Application of Nathaniel Bates for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 10, 1972
Nathaniel Bates, [Mayor of Richmond], and Samuel V. McGrath, Deputy City Attorney
January 11, 1972
Application for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief on Behalf of: the Valley Round Table, San Fernando Chamber of Commerce, Canoga Park Chamber of Commerce, San Fernando Valley Business and Professional Association, January 11, 1972
LaFollette, Johnson, Horgan and Robinson
January 12, 1972
Application of John M. Shelton and Lawrence E. Wayte for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 10, 1972
Chinello, Chinello and Maddy
January 13, 1972
[Angelita Garcia ... vs. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. ...] Motion for Leave to Intervene; Petition for Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 12, 1972

Exhibits [Index]

Exhibits Numbered A----P [Exhibit I missing]

Related Documents

Exhibit BB and BB-1 [Not listed in Index]

Cruz Reynoso , et al.
January 13, 1972
Letter to Chief Justice re ... SAC 7919 from City Council of Riverside, January 13, 1972
John Woodhead, City Attorney
Application of the City of Petaluma and the City of Sonoma for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
William T. Bagley and Arthur V. Azevedo
January 14, 1972
Petition of the City Council of the City of Downey and Its Members as Registered Voters and Taxpayers, for Leave to Intervene as Respondents, Supporting Declaration and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to the Issuance of a Writ of Mandate, January 13, 1972
Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, and Burke, Williams and Sorensen
January 14, 1972
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandate by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 13, 1972
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
January 14, 1972
Application of Michael Halliwell for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
Michael Halliwell
Application of Board of Supervisors of Riverside County for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., County Counsel
January 14, 1972
Application of the City of Redwood City, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, the Council of the City of Redwood City, and James M. Fales, Jr., Manager of the City of Redwood City, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
David E. Schriker, City Attorney
January 14, 1972
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re SAC 7919 [Volume I of Brown Brief], January 14, 1972
Daniel H. Lowenstein
Brief of Petitioner Edmund G. Brown, Jr., [Volume I] [maps, tables] January 14, 1972

See January 17 for Volume II.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
January 14, 1972
Application of Board of Supervisors, County of San Mateo, California, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
Keith C. Sorensen District Attorney, and James M. Parmales, Chief Civil Deputy
January 17, 1972
Application of the City of South Gate, a Municipal Corporation, for Permission to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 13, 1972
John J. Gottes, City Attorney
January 17, 1972
Declarations of Michael B. Berman on Corrections of Legislature's Apportionment Plan, and Memorandum in Support, January 13, 1972
Michael B. Berman
January 17, 1972
Application of County of San Joaquin, a Political Subdivision of the State of California, and City of Stockton, a Municipal Corporation, for Permission to File Brief as Amici Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
Richard. W. Dickenson, County Counsel, and Monroe N. Langdon, City Attorney
January 17, 1972
Application of John Philip Coghlan and the Town of Hillsborough, California, for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
John Philip Coghlan
January 17, 1972
Application of Roy Mespelt, Richard H. Bartke, Frank Cortese, Jr., and Kenneth A. Berndt, to File Brief as Amici Curiae, and Brief, January 14, 1972
Tinning and Delap
January 17, 1972
Reply of Intervenors Alquist, Moscone, Corey, McAlister and Waxman to Response of Ed Reinecke, January 15, 1972
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
January 17, 1972
Application for Permission to File a Brief Amici Curiae, January 17, 1972
Putnam Livermore, Chairman and Attorney of the Republican State Central Committee
January 17, 1972
Application of Charles W. Yetter for Permission to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae, January 17, 1972
James M. Himmel
January 17, 1972
Application of State Senators Joseph Kennick, Albert Rodda and Alan Short for Leave to File a Brief Amicus Curiae (Together with Supporting Declaration) in Support of the Petitioner, January 17, 1972
Seth M. Hufstedler
January 17, 1972
Brief, Amicus Curiae, of John L. Burton, Member of the Assembly of the Legislature of the State of California, in Support of Petitioner, January 17, 1972
John L. Burton
January 17, 1972
Brief Amicus Curiae of Senators Kennick, Rodda and Short, Together with Declaration of Alan G. Rosin in Support of the Petitioner, January 17, 1972
Seth M. Hutstedler
January 17, 1972
Brief of Petitioner Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Volume II, January 17, 1972

See January 14, 1972 for Volume I

Daniel Hays Lowenstein
January 17, 1972
Declaration of Michael B. Berman on the Consequences of the Third Count for the Equal Population Requirement of Congressional and Assembly Reapportionment, January 19, 1972
Michael B. Berman
Motion for Leave to Intervene; by T. Jim Gibson, The Wall Street Political Association, January 17, 1972
Loren Miller, Jr., and Dion G. Morrow
January 17, 1972
Supplemental Brief of Assemblymen Monagan and Stull, Declarations in Support Thereof, and Exhibits, January 17, 1972

Exhibit B

Exhibit F, Part 2

Exhibit G, Part 2

Halley and Cornell
January 17, 1972
Letter to Chief Justice from City Council of Downey [requesting] "leave of Court to Withdraw Their Petition for Leave to Intervene," January 21, 1972
Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, and Burke, Williams and Sorensen
January 24, 1972
[Denial of] the Motion of Angelita Garcia et al. for Leave to Intervene, n.d.
Chief Justice Wright
February 9, 1972

SACRAMENTO 7923
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents


Members of Congress v. Reagan [handwritten list]
[None]
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 5, 1972
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
January 6, 1972
Exhibit "A" to Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (California Legislature -- 1971 1st Extraordinary Session, Assembly Bill No. 16), n.d.
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
January 6, 1972
Letter to Chief Justice re SAC. 7923 [re Consolidation], January 11, 1972
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
January 11, 1972
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandate by Way of Answer [re Wilson Riles as Respondent], January 14, 1972
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
January 14, 1972
Return to Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Way of Answer and Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, January 14, 1972
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
January 14, 1972
Application to Participate as Amicus Curiae, January 14 , 1972 [Robert L. Galloway, Phillip McNuff and Ronald Clause]
Frank J. Pagliaro, Jr.
January 17, 1972
Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus, January 17, 1972
Wyman, Bautzer, Rothman and Kuchel
January 14, 1972
Application to Participate as Amicus Curiae, February 16, 1972 [in opposition to petitioners]
Robert W. Naylor

SACRAMENTO 7917
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Petitioners,

v.

ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents.


SACRAMENTO 7919
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Secretary of State of the State of California, Petitioner,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, Governor of the State of California, Respondent.


Consolidated Action from 1/7/72 [handwritten list]
[None]
Letter re [consolidation], January 7, 1972
G.E. Bishel, Clerk of the Supreme Court
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "On Behalf of Senator John L. Harmer, Senator Fred W. Marler, Jr., and the Other Republican Members of the California State Senate" [re consolidation], January 12, 1972
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
Letter to Chief Justice for City Council of the City of Downey, January 13, 1972
Burke, Williams and Sorenson
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court [re Ed Reinecke], January 13, 1972
Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant and Hannegan
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 14, 1972
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 14, 1972
Kaplan, Livingston, Goodwin, Berkowitz and Selvin
Letter to Chief Justice "on behalf of Senators Harmer and Marler and the Other Republican Members of the State Senate," January 14, 1972

Exhibit A: The Agreed Bipartisan Senate Reapportionment Plan, Senate Bill 18 [6 volumes of legislative history and 5 maps], n.d.

Exhibit B: Senate Reapportionment Plan Proposed by Its Republican Members, Senate Bill 8 in the 1st 1971 Extraordinary Session [with 6 maps], n.d.

Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
January 14, 1972
Application for Permission to File Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles and James S. Allison, Registrar-Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, and Brief, January 12, 1972
Edward H. Gaylord
January 17, 1972
Brief of Petitioners, the Legislature, et al., and Intervenors Alquist, et al., in Reply to Briefs of Board of Supervisors, et al., and of Michael Halliwell as Amici Curiae, and to Petition of Angelita Garcia, et al., January 17, 1972
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
January 17, 1972
Declaration of Ed Reinecke [re Compass Systems, Inc. Plan], January 17, 1972
Thomas B. Hofeller
Declaration of W.N. Durley [of CSI, Inc.], January 17, 1972

Related Documents

8 maps [1 copy only]

W.N. Durley
Declaration of Houston L. Flournoy, January 17, 1972
Houston L. Flournoy
January 17, 1972
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "On behalf of Assemblyman Robert Monagan and Assemblyman John Stull," January 17, 1972
Halley and Cornell
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court "on behalf of Assemblyman Robert G. Beverly," January 17, 1972
Richards, Watson and Dreyfuss
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court, January 17, 1972
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Secretary of State

SACRAMENTO 7917
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Petitioners,

v.

ED REINECKE, as Lieutenant Governor of the State, etc., et al., Respondents.


SACRAMENTO 7919
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., as Secretary of State, etc., Petitioner,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, Respondent.


SACRAMENTO 7923
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Petitioners,

v.

RONALD REAGAN, as Governor of the State of California, et al., Respondents.


Consolidated Cases [handwritten list]
K.K.
February 10, 1972
[Court Order re Reapportionment ]
Chief Justice
January 18, 1972
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "memorandum of costs on behalf of Senators Harmer and Marler," January 20, 1972
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Senators John L. Harmer Fred W. Marler, January 20, 1972
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison
February 10, 1972
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Memorandum of Costs on Behalf of Ed Reinecke, January 24, 1972
Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant and Hannegan
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Ed Reinecke, January 24, 1972
John V. Diepenbrock
February 10, 1972
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "memorandum of costs on behalf of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull," January 26, 1972
Halley and Cornell
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull, Amici Curiae, January 26, 1972
Halley and Cornell
February 10, 1972
Motion for Leave to Intervene and Supplementary Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, by Angelita Garcia, et al., February 7, 1972
California Rural Legal Assistance, et al.
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs or the Part of Assemblymen Robert Monagan and John Stull, n.d.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
February 10, 1972
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Ed Reinecke, n.d.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
February 10, 1972
Opposition to Memorandum of Costs on the Part of Senators John L. Harmer and Fred W. Marler, Jr., n.d.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General
February 10, 1972
Memorandum of Costs on the Part of ... the Legislature ... and on the Part of Senators Alquist and Moscone [et al.], February 24, 1972
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel, and Herman F. Selvin, Special Counsel
March 1, 1972
Request for Modification of Opinion from State Senate, April 28, 1972
George H. Murphy, Legislative Counsel
May 1, 1972
Request by the Assembly of the Legislature of the State of California for Modification of Opinion; and. Supporting Memorandum, October 27, 1972
George H. Murphy , Legislative Counsel and Herman E. Selvin, Special Counsel
October 30, 1972
Request and Order for Substitution of Parties, April 11, 1973
Robert Monagan, et al.
Letter to James W. Halley [re Substitution of Parties], April 17, 1973
G.E. Bishel, Clerk of the Supreme Court
Brief of Congressman Paul N. McCloskey, Jr., in Response to the Report and Recommendations of the Special Masters on Reapportionment, September 28, 1973
Paul N. McCloskey, Jr.
September 28, 1973
Analysis and Critique of Special Masters on Reapportionment Recommendations and Brief in Behalf of an Alternative Plan, n.d.

Exhibit C: [Group of 12 photocopy maps, with one set of autopositive originals]

California County Subdivisions ­­ Census County Divisions and Places

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Exhibit D: Alternative Plan: Criteria Explanation, District Descriptions

Exhibit E: Alternative Districts Overlaid with Masters' Districts [group of 12 maps]

California County Subdivisions -- Census County Divisions and Places

Assembly Districts, Proposed Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts, Proposed Senate Districts

Congressional Districts, Proposed Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of San Diego County

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of the [San Francisco] Bay Area and Vicinity

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Census Tract Outline Map of the Los Angeles Five County Area

Assembly Districts

Senatorial Districts

Congressional Districts

Exhibit F: [Comparison Between Masters' Final Plan and Halliwell Plan]

Assembly Districts

Senate Districts

Congressional Districts

Related Documents

Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re "supplemental material," Michael J. Halliwell November 1, 1973

Exhibits Presented with Oral Argument [list], n.d.

Masters' District Registration (pp. 13-21)

[Folder]

Maps [numbered 1----12 [with markings]
[Statistical Lists]

Masters' District Registration

Assembly District Registration

Senate District Registration

Congress District Registration

Census Tracts Making up Assembly District 37 as Proposed by the Masters of the California Supreme Court, etc.

[Envelope containing 8 statistical lists]

Michael J. Halliwell
October 1, 1973
Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Special Masters' Report and Recommendations on Reapportionment [for Imperial County], n.d.
James H. Harmon, County Counsel, et al.
October 2, 1973
Brief Filed by the City Attorney of the City of Glendale, State of California, on Behalf of the City of Glendale as Amicus Curiae in the Above Entitled Action Opposition to a Portion of the Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment September 28, 1973
Joseph W. Rainville, City Attorney
October 2, 1973
Brief of Board of Supervrisors of Riverside County as Amicus Curiae on Report of Special Masters on Reapportionment , September 28, 1973
Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., ounty Counsel
October 2, 1973
Letter to the Clerk of the Supreme Court re "Brief of the California State Senate," October 2, 1973
Brobeck , Phleger and Harrison
Brief of the California State Senate, September 28, 1973

Material Accompanying Brief of California State Senate, n.d,

Robert S. Daggett
October 2, 1973
Brief for Congressman Victor V. Veysey in Opposition to a Portion of the Masters' Report, October 1, 1973
Reid, Babbage and Coil
October 2, 1973
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Exception and Petition for Modification, John J. Miller, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Western Region, October 2, 1973
John J. Miller, Assemblyman
October 4, 1973
Letter to Clerk of the Supreme Court re Objections and Recommended Revisions of the Woodland Hills Residents Association, et al., October 17, 1973
Tuttle and Taylor
Objections and Recommended Revisions of Woodland Hills Residents Association, Tarzana Property Owners Association, Calabasas Chamber of Commerce, and Save Old Calabasas Committee to Special Masters Proposed 38th and 43rd Assembly Districts, n.d.

Exhibit C: [map]

Antonio Rossman
Letter from County of Ventura Suggesting Alterations to Masters' Plan, October 23, 1973

3 Maps [originals and photographs]

Assembly District 36: Ventura County Plan

Assembly Districts 36, 37, 38: Masters Plan

Senate Plan

Monty C. Lish, County Executive
[Map of Coronado with proposed alterations to Masters' Plan]
[City of Coronado]
[Map of Assembly districts, northern Alameda County with proposed alterations to Masters' Plan]
Senators Petris and Holmdahl
Los Angeles-Long Beach Area, Masters Reapportionment Proposal for the 29th Senatorial District, and the 47th and 48th Assembly Districts; Proposed Realignment of the 47th and 48th Assembly Districts, [map with markings], n.d.
[None]


 [index]  [next]  [prev]