[index]  [next]  [prev] Box 4

  1. U.S. Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, Preclearance
    1. [Letter from Paul McKaskle, Director and Chief Counsel, Special Masters, to Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, John R. Dunne, re: redistricting preclearance - California] (10/18/91)
    2. [Letter from Assistant Attorney General, John R. Dunne, to Louisiana state senators concerning redistricting preclearance in Louisiana] [6/28/91]
    3. [Letter from Assistant Attorney General, John R. Dunne, to Hainon A. Miller, chair, Mississippi Senate Elections Committee,  concerning redistricting of the Mississippi Legislature] [7/2/91]
    4. Letter from Assistant Attorney General John R. Dunne to Virginia Deputy Attorney General, K. Marshall Cook, concerning redistricting of the Virginia House of Delegates [7/10/91]
    5. [Letter from Assistant Attorney General, John R. Dunne, to New York City Districting Commission concerning 1991 districting plan for the New York City Council in Bronx, Kings and Yew York counties, NY] [7/19/91]
  2. Secretary of State March Fong Eu Presentation, S022835
    1. Written presentation of defendant March Fong Eu regarding the critical nature of the timing and substance of proceeding (10/18/91)
  3. Amicus Curiae Briefs, S022835
    1. ... United Chambers of Commerce of the San Fernando Valley, et al., three copies and one fax copy (10/21/91)
    2. Brief of Quentin L. Kopp,  request for judicial notice and declaration of amicus curiae (10/28-29/91)
    3. Brief of the [California] Attorney General as amicus curiae, three copies (11/1/91)
  4. Public Hearings
    1. Public hearing, Sacramento (10/24/91)
    2. Public hearing, San Francisco (10/25/91)
    3. Public hearing, San Francisco (10/26/91)
    4. Public hearing, San Diego (10/30/91)
    5. Public hearing, Los Angeles (10/31/91)
    6. Public hearing, Los Angeles (11/1/91)
  5. Requests to appear at public hearings and public comments submitted to Special Masters
  6. Rose Institute submissions
    1. UCLA Law Review, v.33, no.1, Symposium, "Gerrymandering and the Courts" (10/85)
    2. Presentation before the Special Masters on Reapportionment by Alan Heslop and Leroy Hardy (10/30/91)
    3. National Conference of State Legislatures 1991-92 Publications Catalogue
    4. Information packet on Senate Bill 287, 1991, Redistricting in 1991: Time to Draw the Line [9/30/91]
    5. Publication: The Gerrymander: Origin, Conception and Re-emergence, by Leroy Hardy (1990)
    6. Publication: Redistricting Reform: an Action Program  [by Leroy Hardy and Alan Heslop] (1990)
    7. Gerrymandering in California, 1981-82, Illustrations, [1982?]; The Gerrymander Explained (n.d.)
    8. Publication: Reapportionment Law: the 1990's, by the National Conference of State Legislatures (Oct. 1989)
    9. Annual Report, 1990-91 of the Rose Institute (4/15/91)
  7. News Releases from the California Administrative Office of the Courts (9/26/91-12/2/91)
  8. Collected newspaper articles concerning the 1990 Masters' reapportionment (12/3/91-12/18/91)
  9. Submissions to Director and Chief Counsel Paul L. McKaskle re: Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment, in the Supreme Court of the state of California, no. S0228355, [1992?] by Michael J. Halliwell.
    1. Submission regarding Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment
    2. Legal analysis supporting changes in Masters' districts proposed in "Submission to Director and Chief Counsel Paul L. McKaskle re: Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment in the Supreme Court of the state of California. S022835 by Prof. Michael J. Halliwell, [1992?] [Incomplete copy, pp. 1-21 only]
    3. Petition to enlarge mandate of Special Masters on Reapportionment, by Prof. Michael J. Halliwell, S022835 (Jan. 14, 1992)
  10. Cases and materials on reapportionment
    1. California Constitution, Art. XXI, Sec.1
    2. Opinion of the Attorney General, 80-1109 (7/21/81)
    3. Notice of hearing before the Special Masters on Reapportionment and Rules of Hearings; and related materials (1973)
    4. Silver v. Brown (1965) 63 Cal.2d 270
    5. Legislature v. Reinecke (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 595
    6. Legislature v. Reinecke (1973) 9 Cal. 3d 166
    7. Legislature v. Reinecke (1973) 10 Cal. 3d 396
    8. Appendix B to 10 Cal. 3d 396
    9. Assembly v. Deukmejian (1981) 30 Cal. 3d 638
    10. Voting Rights Act of 1965, As amended, 42 U.S.C. $ 1973(a)-(ff)
    11. 28 CFR ch. 1, parts 51-51.67
    12. Thornburg v. Gingles, (1986) 478 U.S. 30
    13. Garza v. City of Los Angeles, (1990) 918 F.2d 763
    14. McNeil v. Springfield Park District, (7 Cir. 1988) 851 F.2d 937
    15. East Jefferson Coalition v. Jefferson, (E.D. La. 1988) 691 F.Supp. 991
    16. Reynolds v. Sims, (1964) 377 U.S. 533
    17. Kirkpatrick v. Priesler, (1969) 394 U.S. 526
    18. Calderon v. City of Los Angeles, (1971) 4 Cal.3d 251
  11. Maps
    1. Master's plan maps
    2. Delegation's plan maps
    3. Miscellaneous districting maps
    4. Senate plan maps
  12. Miscellaneous File
    1. Voting Rights Act, Congressional district breakdowns comparing Panel, MALDEF and Plan A plans (filed 10/26/91)
    2. Copies of Supreme Court Calendar (5 copies), (1/13/92)
    3. Memorandum : [correction to Report and Recommendations of Special Masters on Reapportionment] (1/10/92)
    4. Governor's Fine Tuning Tract Splits (n.d.)
    5. [District reports for Masters Plan, Assembly, Senate and Congressional districts, by voter registration and ethnicity] (12/2-3/91)
    6. Special Masters on Reapportionment Recommendations, list of tract districts by county] (11/29/91)


 [index]  [next]  [prev]