Date: December 9, 1991
From: Office of the Special Masters on Reapportionment
To: Appearing Parties
The following corrections have been made to the
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF SPECIAL MASTERS ON REAPPORTIONMENT
"provisions. (See Delaney v. Superior Court (1990) 50
Cal. 3d. 785, 802-803 [ballot arguments are accepted sources from which
to ascertain voters intent and intent of voters governs interpretation
of constitutional provisions enacted by them]); White v. Davis (1975) 13
Cal 3d. 757, 775 [ballot argument identifies the principal "mischiefs"
at which the constitutional amendment is directed].)"
"Districts 11, 15, 18 and 20" and
On page 55, line 2, for "District 16," substitute "District
18;" on line 3, for "District 18," substitute "District 20;"
on line 7, add the phrase "...for the district as a whole." to the end
of the sentence.
Various typographical, punctuation and grammatical errors not affecting substance have also been made to the report.